Research Integrity

Share

Resources

​​​​​​​​​​Guidelines
  1. External Research Collaboration
  2. NTU Authorship Guidelines​
  3. Acknowledgements in Research Communications
  4. Research Integrity Grant Conditions
  5. Guidance Note on the Use of ‘TurnItIn’ Plagiarism Checker
  6. Further Guidance on anti-plagiarism checks on Masters and PhD Theses
  7. Guidance Note on Misrepresentation of credentials 
  8. Guidance Note on Image Manipulation
  9. Guidelines on Predatory Journals and Conferences​
  10. Joint Statement on Research Integrity Relating to Scholarly Publications (updated 22 Oct 2018)

Foundational Documents

  1. Singapore Statement on Research Integrity
  2. Montréal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations
  3. Global Research Council Statement of Principles for Research Integrity (May 2013)
  4. Vancouver Protocol​

Reading Materials

  1. Steneck, N.H. (2007) "Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research". Retrieved from https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/rcrintro.pdf
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (2014) "For the Sound Development of Science: The Attitude of a Conscientious Scientist". Retrieved from https://www.jsps.go.jp/j-kousei/data/rinri_e.pdf
  3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. (2017) "Fostering Integrity in Research". 
  4. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)'s Core Pactices.
  5. ICMJE Recommendations​
  6. ​​​​Everyone needs a data-management plan. Nature 555, 286 (2018). doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-03065-z "They sound dull, but data-management plans are essential, and funders must explain why."
  7. Data management made simple​. Nature 555, 403-405 (2018). doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-03071-1 "Keeping your research data freely available is crucial for open science - and your funding could depend on it."
  8. "​Keeping science honest", by Josefin Sundin and Fredrik Jutfelt. Science, Vol 359, Issue 6383, pp. 1443. doi:10.1126/science.aat3473  
  9. 'UK trials of airway transplants are in limbo​', by Matt Warren. Science, Vol 359, Issue 6383, pp. 1448-1450. doi:10.1126/science.359.6383.1448      ​
  10. The Hague Ethical Guidelines​ for responsible conduct in the chemical sciences.
  11. ​​Before reproducibility ​must come preproducibility​. Nature ​557, 613 (2018). doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05256-0​
    "Instead of arguing about whether results hold up, let’s push to provide enough information for others to repeat the experiments, says Philip Stark."​
  12. House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee's Sixth Report of Session 2017-2019, Research Integrity.
  13. "Tide of Lies", by Kai Kupferschmidt. Science, Vol 361, Issue 6403, pp. 636-641. doi: 10.1126/science.361.6403.636
  14. "India targets universities in predatory-journal crackdown", by Subhra Priyadarshini. Nature 560, 537-538 (2018). doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06048-2
  15. Infographics on the responsible conduct of research and handling of research misconduct.
  16. "Thousands of scientists publish a paper every 5 days", by John P.A. Ioannidis, Richard Klavans & Kevin W. Boyack. Nature 561, 167-169 (2018). doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8
  17. "Predatory conference scammers are getting smarter", by Emma Stoye. 
  18. "Systematic fabrication of scientific images revealed", by Jana Christopher. FEBS Letters, Vol 592, p3027-9 (26 Jul 2018).
  19. "Research on research", by Martin Enserink. Science, Vol 361, Issue 6408, pp. 1178-1179. doi: 10.1126/science.361.6408.1178
  20. "Journals under the microscope", by Jennifer Couzin-Frankel. Science, Vol 361, Issue 6408, pp. 1180-1183. doi: 10.1126/science.361.6408.1180
  21. "The metawars", by Jop de Vrieze. Science, Vol 361, Issue 6408, pp.1184-1188. doi: 10.1126/science.361.6408.1178
  22. "The truth squad", by Erik Stokstad. Science, Vol 361, Issue 6408, pp. 1189-1191. doi: 10.1126/science.361.6408.1189
  23. "A recipe for rigor", by Kai Kupferschmidt. Science, Vol 361, Issue 6408, pp.1192-1193. doi: 10.1126/science.361.6408.1192
  24. "Toward a more scientific science", by Pierre Azoulay et.al. Science, Vol 361, Issue 6408, pp.1194-1197. doi: 10.1126/science.aav2484
  25. Science, Vol 361 (21 September 2018).

 

Retraction Watch: http://retractionwatch.com/
PubPeer: https://pubpeer.com/